From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: line-move-visual Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:40:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200907092112.21879.jem@iki.fi> <87ws6hupsk.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1247258470 23478 80.91.229.12 (10 Jul 2009 20:41:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:41:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bastienguerry@googlemail.com, jem@iki.fi, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 10 22:41:03 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MPMty-0000vE-9u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:41:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47337 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MPMtx-0004Au-PG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:41:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MPMtP-0003V5-Bw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:40:27 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MPMtK-0003Q0-Fr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:40:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49448 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MPMtK-0003Pr-53 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:40:22 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:54724) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MPMtJ-0007fx-S4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:40:21 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MPMtH-0000vx-Np; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:40:19 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Miles Bader on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:43:10 +0900) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112321 Archived-At: Emacs is not a democracy, although the maintainers generally pay a lot of attention to the opinions and arguments of others. In the face of contentious changes, it's the job of the maintainers to understand the arguments on both sides and make a judgement call as to what the best solution for the entire Emacs user base is. This is true. However, polling the users is a good way for the maintainers to learn how users think about a proposed change.