From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Sending attachments
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:21:07 -0400
Message-ID: <E1MMjdT-0004fh-5B@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1MM5lq-0003BA-MV@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87k52rzyn1.fsf@benthic.rattlesnake.com>
	<873a9fw6dt.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87y6r7yp1y.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<E1MMj74-0003cD-P4@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: ams@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1246630886 22963 80.91.229.12 (3 Jul 2009 14:21:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 14:21:26 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, miles@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: rms@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 03 16:21:19 2009
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1MMjdf-0000Sb-7R
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:21:19 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50561 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MMjde-0008TH-GI
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:21:18 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MMjdY-0008Ss-OC
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:21:12 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MMjdU-0008SX-Eu
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:21:12 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58471 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MMjdT-0008ST-PK
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:21:08 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:49150)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>) id 1MMjdT-0008Jx-Jk
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:21:07 -0400
Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>)
	id 1MMjdT-0004fh-5B; Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:21:07 -0400
In-reply-to: <E1MMj74-0003cD-P4@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard
	Stallman on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:47:38 -0400)
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6,
	seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:111962
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/111962>

   I object strenuously to the idea of replacing the very simple Mail
   mode with something complex from Gnus.

As a user of mail-mode, I agree fully.

Adding something like etach would be the right solution.