Re: [PATCH] adjusting korean key bindings

[Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>]

In article <9d644d9b0906170106r1955c983jf7309e1a49158c01@mail.gmail.com>, Jihyun Cho <jihyun.jo@gmail.com> writes:

> We are miscommunicating.
> I understood that you were concerning about users who are still using F9.
> And what I want to tell you about is, those
> functions(`quail-hangul-switch-hanja', `hangul-to-hanja-conversion')
> are doing same job(to input Hanja), but using different ways.

Yes, I understand that.

> If you think the backward compatibility is a problem, please just
> apply the function 'hangul-to-hanja-conversion' in my patch for many
> users to want to customize a keymap.
> And I have one more asking. There is no bindings for
> 'Hangul','Hangul_Hanja'. Would you add these bindings?

Then, to summarize the requested changes:

o It doesn't change the previous usage.
o It adds new key-binding for 'Hangul' and 'Hangul_Hanja'
  keys.  They are almost the standard keys for Korean users.
o It modifies hangul-to-hanja-conversion so that it can be called
  even when korean input method is off.
o Currently the special key bindings for Korean is not
  documented.  So, the change does't require updating the
  manual.  But, of course, documenting them somewhere is
  preferable.

In article <jwvmy8ddubv.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

> I don't understand enough of the subject to judge, really.  Does the
> change require updating the manual?  Does it change previous usage, or
> just add new one?

Please see above.

> We're really close to a release now, so I'd rather not make such changes
> so late in the game.

I understand that, but, for Korean users, I think this
change improves the usability very much.

---
Kenichi Handa
handa@m17n.org