From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#3146: Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:09:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <97B22175-EA06-4EBC-B831-D225CEC03DAA@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii , 3146@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1243959999 3679 80.91.229.12 (2 Jun 2009 16:26:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 3146@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Adrian Robert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 02 18:26:35 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MBWon-0002Ki-QN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:26:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44002 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MBWon-00020w-7M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:26:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MBWg4-0003SV-OF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:17:29 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MBWfz-0003NN-Ly for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:17:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33039 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MBWfy-0003Mr-CY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:17:22 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:41162) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MBWfx-00023m-NS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:17:22 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n52GHIxg030007; Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:17:20 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n52GF5Ke029450; Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:15:05 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:15:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 3146 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,ns X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 3146-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B3146.124395899328745 (code B ref 3146); Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:15:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at 3146) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 2 Jun 2009 16:09:53 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n52G9mnn028728 for <3146@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:09:49 -0700 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MBWYd-0000H8-Bg; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:09:47 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Adrian Robert on Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:06:36 +0700) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:17:27 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:28443 Archived-At: > Cc: 3146@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com > From: Adrian Robert > Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:06:36 +0700 > > > On Jun 1, 2009, at 9:59 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Who or what truncated the rest of the Subject line for this bug > > report? > > If you hit "reply" on the web interface, it does not transfer the > subject automatically. I don't always remember to manually copy it. Check the headers: it wasn't my mail to which I was responding. I was asking who or what truncated the subject of this discussion somewhere along the way. The subject is now unreadable by humans, because it includes on the bug number, but not its description.