From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: remove leim/leim-list.el for make bootstrap? Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:07:24 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87r60seqk5.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1237788450 31773 80.91.229.12 (23 Mar 2009 06:07:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: miles@gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 23 07:08:47 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LldKz-0007XO-0k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:08:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53259 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LldJc-0004I9-8o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:07:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LldJS-0004Hg-Vm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:07:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LldJO-0004H9-1s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:07:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33488 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LldJN-0004H6-UA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:07:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:46404) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LldJI-0003IN-D3; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:06:56 -0400 Original-Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id n2N66qwH027862; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:06:52 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp1.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id n2N66qIR000727; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:06:52 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id n2N66pKd019416; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:06:51 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LldJk-0004Fb-Ac; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:07:24 +0900 In-reply-to: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:18:47 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109788 Archived-At: In article , Eli Zaretskii writes: > Yes, but if quail.elc is from an old quail.el, then it also did this: > (with-current-buffer list-buf > (setq buffer-file-coding-system 'iso-2022-7bit) > (save-buffer 0)) > And if the coding tag says utf-8, I'd expect this to produce a warning > due to mismatch. In such a case, the buffer is saved by utf-8 without warning. There were discussions about what to do in such a case, and I think the conclusion was the current behavior (perhaps to issue warning only when a coding system in coding-tag can't encode the buffer and some other coding system is selected). --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org