From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard M Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2707: 23.0.91; RMAIL summary not in step with main file Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:18:52 -0400 Message-ID: References: <9424-Wed18Mar2009073326+0000-jpff@codemist.co.uk> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org, 2707@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1237416255 1470 80.91.229.12 (18 Mar 2009 22:44:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2707@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, jpff@codemist.co.uk To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 18 23:45:31 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lk4Vu-0007hb-HT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:45:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51188 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lk4UY-0000d1-8U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:44:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lk4UJ-0000Xb-HB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:43:51 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lk4UE-0000Td-LX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:43:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60516 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lk4UE-0000Ta-B1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:43:46 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:34783) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lk4UD-00006H-Nw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:43:46 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n2IMhhkb002762; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:43:43 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n2IMP8C1030195; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:25:08 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Richard M Stallman Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , Rmail Maintainers Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:25:08 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2707 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,rmail X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2707-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2707.123741473528360 (code B ref 2707); Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:25:08 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2707) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 18 Mar 2009 22:18:55 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n2IMIruo028354 for <2707@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:18:54 -0700 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Lk468-0005FK-6y; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:18:52 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Glenn Morris on Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:35:17 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:43:50 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:26470 Archived-At: This is a consequence of the following change. Now rmail-expunge does not update the summary if called with dont-show non-nil. When DONT-SHOW is non-nil, should rmail-expunge do this, or should the caller do it? The reason I am not sure is that the code seems to expect that summary manipulation to also do the job of showing the message, and DONT-SHOW says not to do that.