From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard M Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: emacs/lisp/mail rmail.el
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:15:22 -0400
Message-ID: <E1LjNtq-0006eZ-Tw@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1LjD5L-0002L8-TV@cvs.savannah.gnu.org>
	<uc3add5qtx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1237252544 20084 80.91.229.12 (17 Mar 2009 01:15:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:15:44 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 17 02:17:00 2009
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1LjNvO-0003Sl-Ow
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:16:58 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35024 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LjNu2-00056f-9P
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:15:34 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LjNtw-00056K-QQ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:15:28 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LjNtr-00055W-Nv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:15:27 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42060 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LjNtr-00055T-IW
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:15:23 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:42980)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1LjNtr-0003rj-BW
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:15:23 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1LjNtq-0006eZ-Tw; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:15:23 -0400
In-reply-to: <uc3add5qtx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Glenn Morris on
	Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:18:34 -0400)
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6,
	seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109661
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/109661>

    This change is inconsistent with Emacs 22, and the documentation in
    rmail.el and rmail.texi.

The problem has to be fixed.  The behavior as of yesterday is so
inconvenient that I can't believe anyone wants it.

I just looked at the old Rmail code and saw this:

	    (rmail-clear-headers "^sender:\\|^return-path:\\|^received:")

which had got lost.  Would you prefer that fix?