From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard M Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: smtpmail.el security flaw in selecting authentication mechanism
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:01:33 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Lez9h-0008QT-ER@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87myc24lia.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1236204150 5424 80.91.229.12 (4 Mar 2009 22:02:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 22:02:30 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Simon Josefsson <simon@yubico.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 04 23:03:47 2009
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1LezBg-0007Lo-An
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:03:36 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58216 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LezAL-0002ul-4e
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:02:13 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lez9k-0002PJ-Oh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:01:36 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Lez9j-0002O4-32
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:01:36 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42356 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lez9i-0002Ns-Rb
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:01:34 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:57403)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1Lez9i-000498-5E
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:01:34 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1Lez9h-0008QT-ER; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:01:33 -0500
In-reply-to: <87myc24lia.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> (message from Simon
	Josefsson on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:30:21 +0100)
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6,
	seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109454
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/109454>

I am pretty sure we don't plan to make another release of Emacs 22.
Do you think we should make one just on account of this?