From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unicode character read representation Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:28:31 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87hc2n28a4.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1235633298 18067 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2009 07:28:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:28:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 26 08:29:34 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LcagX-0006dA-Ih for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:29:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60489 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LcafC-0006lZ-Pt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:28:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lcaf9-0006lQ-5x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:28:07 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lcaf7-0006kd-Fr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:28:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41398 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lcaf7-0006ka-BC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:28:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:34143) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lcaf6-0001V9-MR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:28:05 -0500 Original-Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id n1Q7S2CZ006841; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:28:02 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id n1Q7S1nf000826; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:28:01 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id n1Q7S06u000607; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:28:00 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LcafX-00083p-Pc; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:28:31 +0900 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:16:13 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109341 Archived-At: In article , Stefan Monnier writes: > > Currently Emacs signals an error only for U+400000 and over, > > and I'm not sure how strictly we should interprete > > \U.. notation. > I think the \U notation should only work for actual unicode chars. > (assuming the \x{..} notation can be used for everything else). For instance 0xFFFF is a valid Unicode code-point, but is not a character. Should it be accepted or not? --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org