From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard M Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2222: 23.0.90; Labels in RMAIL Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:13:26 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org, 2222@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234874666 841 80.91.229.12 (17 Feb 2009 12:44:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:44:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2222@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, jpff@codemist.co.uk To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 17 13:45:41 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LZPKQ-0008VB-6u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:45:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46933 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZPJ6-0000DL-4z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:44:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LZPIb-0008MS-Ki for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:43:41 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LZPIZ-0008Lb-AY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:43:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59234 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZPIY-0008LN-Tv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:43:39 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:42903) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LZPIY-0004yO-2w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:43:38 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1HChZOa027037; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:43:35 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n1HCP4Wm022428; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:25:04 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Richard M Stallman Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , Rmail Maintainers Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:25:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2222 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,rmail X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2222-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2222.123487293521054 (code B ref 2222); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:25:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2222) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 17 Feb 2009 12:15:35 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1HCFWCV021048 for <2222@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:15:33 -0800 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LZOpK-00079T-Di; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:13:26 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:36:37 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:43:39 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:25360 Archived-At: In your scenario, I can see why it would make sense to show the message. But if such a message is always added (e.g. to store the "-*-rmail-*-" cookie), then it should be made invisible. There is no need for that. Just to check that it is an Rmail file, searching for the X-RMAIL-ATTRIBUTES header is sufficient.