From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard M Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2137: 23.0.60; Saving Rmail buffer does not show the "Saving file ..." message Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:39:39 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org, 2137@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233853897 30787 80.91.229.12 (5 Feb 2009 17:11:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2137@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Stefan Monnier , 2137@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 05 18:12:48 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LV7m7-0004rW-KQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:12:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40881 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LV7ko-0006cI-91 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:11:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LV7da-0000v9-25 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:03:38 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LV7dX-0000tu-9A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:03:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53384 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LV7dX-0000to-5H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:03:35 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:44853) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LV7dW-0001yk-Bv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:03:34 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n15H3WU7016697; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:03:32 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n15Go5bB013361; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:50:05 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Richard M Stallman Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , Rmail Maintainers Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:50:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2137 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,rmail X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2137-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2137.123385209711938 (code B ref 2137); Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:50:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2137) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 5 Feb 2009 16:41:37 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n15GfTPx011932 for <2137@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:41:31 -0800 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LV7GN-0002aQ-OM; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:39:39 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:49:40 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:03:36 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:24975 Archived-At: save-buffer is not enough either in order to handle `autosave' (which was the original reason for my using write-region-annotate-functions rather than write-contents-functions). That is true -- the implementation of saving for Rmail buffers needs to handle auto-save one way or another. That doesn't necessarily mean it has to work through this hook. > The simplest fix is to simply always output the message rather than only > for files larger than 50KB. > That would be easy, but not quite the most convenient behavior. What would be the harm? Nowadays, I guess it is ok to display the message for all files.