From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard M Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: New paren matching feature request
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:31:14 -0500
Message-ID: <E1LTVrO-0001dR-2u@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <8643544.333831233366508350.JavaMail.www@wwinf4610>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233470258 13657 80.91.229.12 (1 Feb 2009 06:37:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 06:37:38 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: alinsoar@voila.fr
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 01 07:38:52 2009
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1LTVyl-0004Ms-Uk
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:38:52 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32973 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LTVxT-0002PD-1w
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:37:31 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LTVt6-0000mH-II
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:33:00 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LTVt4-0000le-Ld
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:32:59 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57860 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LTVt4-0000lZ-Gz
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:32:58 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:59139)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1LTVt4-0002oX-8P
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:32:58 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1LTVrO-0001dR-2u; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:31:14 -0500
In-reply-to: <8643544.333831233366508350.JavaMail.www@wwinf4610>
	(alinsoar@voila.fr)
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6,
	seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108502
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/108502>

    I still believe that my idea of indetation as an integral over the
    sexp is better than the current local-parsing idea of identation.

Could you refresh our memories about your idea
and how it works?