From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard M Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Change in rmail-reply Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:30:28 -0500 Message-ID: References: <874ozgc7fc.fsf@xemacs.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233470060 13361 80.91.229.12 (1 Feb 2009 06:34:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 06:34:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pandyacus@sbcglobal.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 01 07:35:33 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LTVvV-0003Vq-8M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:35:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59845 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LTVuC-0001Eu-O8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:34:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LTVsU-0000cI-TQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:32:23 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LTVsU-0000by-2G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:32:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57844 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LTVsT-0000bq-Mg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:32:21 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:59071) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LTVsT-0002jR-F8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:32:21 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LTVqe-0001Vz-MT; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:30:28 -0500 In-reply-to: <874ozgc7fc.fsf@xemacs.org> (stephen@xemacs.org) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108499 Archived-At: Obviously you and Richard have a different intuition, based on the fact that you don't use resend for its designed purpose, but rather because it saves keystrokes compared to forward (in his case, anyway). I don't actually use it, and my thinking about it has nothing to do with saving keystrokes. The question I am thinking about is what behavior for various commands would be useful and coherent.