From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: labels of RMAIL not inherited Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:54:55 +0900 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233122115 15019 80.91.229.12 (28 Jan 2009 05:55:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 28 06:56:26 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LS3PU-0003M1-OF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:56:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48992 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LS3OC-000153-SA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:55:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LS3O6-00014u-Pq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:54:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LS3O6-00014i-0O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:54:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58181 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LS3O5-00014f-PT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:54:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:36945) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LS3O1-00070w-HX; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:54:54 -0500 Original-Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id n0S5slFt029497; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:54:47 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id n0S5sl7l006194; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:54:47 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id n0S5skbv022317; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:54:46 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LS3O3-0000No-BZ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:54:55 +0900 In-reply-to: (message from Richard M Stallman on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:48:24 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108322 Archived-At: In article , Richard M Stallman writes: > I just started to use the new rmail (i.e. pmail). When I > first do M-x rmail, the babyl format of RMAIL is converted > to mbox format automatically. But, it seems that labels are > lost. At least, they are not shown in RMAIL nor > RMAIL-summary buffers. > unrmail needs to be fixed to transfer the labels. > When I wrote it, there was no way to record labels in an mbox file > so discarding them was inevitable. I found that the labels are not lost but preserved as these headers: X-BABYL-V6-ATTRIBUTES: X-BABYL-V6-KEYWORDS: and newly added ones are recorded as these headers: X-RMAIL-ATTRIBUTES: X-RMAIL-KEYWORDS: Just recently, Chong fixed it: * mail/unrmail.el (unrmail): Record labels in X-RMAIL-* fields, which are recognized by the new Rmail, instead of X-BABYL-V6-*. So, it seems that the already converted RMAIL file can be fixed just by replacing X-BABYL-V6 to X-RMAIL. But the problem of keywords not shown in RMAIL-summary is not yet fixed. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org