From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: rmail -- rmail-summary movement Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:28:37 +0100 Message-ID: Reply-To: ams@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233008313 3770 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2009 22:18:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 26 23:19:44 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LRZnV-0003cA-DE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:19:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60990 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRZmD-0000tM-Bn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:17:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRY4g-0008UR-RX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:28:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRY4f-0008Th-1E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:28:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52284 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRY4e-0008TX-Rq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:28:48 -0500 Original-Received: from hq.kreditor.se ([213.136.42.58]:1804 helo=auxid.hq.kred) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LRY4e-0007Is-97 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:28:48 -0500 Original-Received: by auxid.hq.kred (Postfix, from userid 118) id 75A481378042; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:28:47 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from beryx.hq.kred (unknown [10.16.0.106]) by auxid.hq.kred (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF281378012; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:28:47 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ams by beryx.hq.kred with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LRY4T-0005aK-8D; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:28:37 +0100 In-reply-to: message from Chong Yidong on Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:06:26 -0500 Original-References: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108263 Archived-At: > When moving in rmail-summary from message to message, > rmail-summary-previous-msg and rmail-summary-next-msg do not honour > the `deleted' label, and will happily move onto a deleted message. > The previous behaviour was that if a message was marked as deleted, > rmail-summary would skip over it. > > If the message shows as `deleted' in rmail-summary, the behaviour > works, but the status of each message is cleared with a reissue of > rmail-summary. (See previous mail entitled `rmail -- summary') I cannot reproduce this either. Could you check if your CVS copy is completely up to date? It is, even did a bootstrap. Maybe it was something with the conversion of the old BABYL file? I'll see if I can get better data; it is hard for me to read mail right now since rmail is very broken for me.