From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard M Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Change in rmail-reply
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:30:58 -0500
Message-ID: <E1LRUMU-00079o-HX@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233007015 31530 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2009 21:56:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:56:55 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Glenn Morris  <rgm@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 26 22:58:08 2009
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1LRZT5-00054r-Nw
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:58:07 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38899 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LRZRo-0000yR-0o
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:56:48 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LRXed-0004xp-BA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:01:55 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LRXeT-0004sE-EK
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:01:47 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57036 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRXeS-0004rV-O9
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:01:44 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:32881)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1LRXeS-0003aK-3r
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:01:44 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1LRUMU-00079o-HX; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:30:58 -0500
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6,
	seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108262
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/108262>

    +	* mail/rmail.el (rmail-reply): Don't include Resent-To and Resent-Cc in
    +	replies.  (Bug#512)

Why do you think this change is correct in general?
It gives the desired results in this particular case,
but in general it seems to be wrong.