From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: rmail -- rmail-summary movement Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:15:50 +0100 Message-ID: Reply-To: ams@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1232996290 22662 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2009 18:58:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:58:10 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 26 19:59:23 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LRWfz-0002sK-G5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:59:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42902 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRWeh-00067o-DP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:57:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRVfn-0000i7-VD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:55:00 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRVfm-0000hC-Qg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:54:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41314 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRVfm-0000gv-Co for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:54:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:52019) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LRVGw-0004sw-Rg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:29:19 -0500 Original-Received: from hq.kreditor.se ([213.136.42.58] helo=auxid.hq.kred) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LROX4-0002mB-Sg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 05:17:31 -0500 Original-Received: by auxid.hq.kred (Postfix, from userid 118) id 6444E137A562; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:16:00 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from beryx.hq.kred (unknown [10.16.0.106]) by auxid.hq.kred (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D904137A118 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:16:00 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ams by beryx.hq.kred with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LROVS-0004ss-AQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:15:50 +0100 X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108247 Archived-At: When moving in rmail-summary from message to message, rmail-summary-previous-msg and rmail-summary-next-msg do not honour the `deleted' label, and will happily move onto a deleted message. The previous behaviour was that if a message was marked as deleted, rmail-summary would skip over it. If the message shows as `deleted' in rmail-summary, the behaviour works, but the status of each message is cleared with a reissue of rmail-summary. (See previous mail entitled `rmail -- summary')