From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Please try Pmail
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:56:17 -0500
Message-ID: <E1LPW4X-0004gP-K7@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <jwviqoah92u.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1LPPaW-0000Ux-MM@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1232517493 6534 80.91.229.12 (21 Jan 2009 05:58:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:58:13 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: rms@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 21 06:59:22 2009
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1LPW7V-0003Kz-Dy
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:59:21 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45659 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LPW6E-0008Gc-1j
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:58:02 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LPW67-0008GX-7T
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:57:55 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LPW65-0008GL-LD
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:57:54 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54909 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LPW65-0008GI-I4
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:57:53 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:53369)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1LPW65-00030e-76
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:57:53 -0500
Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1LPW4X-0004gP-K7; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:56:17 -0500
In-reply-to: <E1LPPaW-0000Ux-MM@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard M
	Stallman on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:00:52 -0500)
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6,
	seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108026
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/108026>

> From: Richard M Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:00:52 -0500
> Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
> 
>     So Pmail displays the messages directly from the raw mbox buffer?
> 
> No it doesn't.  (If it did, it would need only one buffer.)
> But it does, apparently, do narrowing in the buffer that holds
> the file.

What for?  If display is from another buffer, why do we need to
narrow?  That's Rmail legacy, isn't it.