From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (featurep 'multi-tty) => t on Windows Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:03:10 -0500 Message-ID: References: <986647.41664.qm@web83205.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229083504 4886 80.91.229.12 (12 Dec 2008 12:05:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: pandyacus@sbcglobal.net Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 12 13:06:08 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LB6lZ-0000me-0I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:05:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49163 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LB6kN-0001xk-B9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:03:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LB6kI-0001wy-Ju for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:03:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LB6kI-0001wi-8f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:03:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47007 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LB6kH-0001wf-Uu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:03:50 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:48684) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LB6kH-0005DE-Gg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:03:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LB6je-0001KX-Qx; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:03:10 -0500 In-reply-to: <986647.41664.qm@web83205.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (message from Chetan Pandya on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:38:58 -0800 (PST)) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106838 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:38:58 -0800 (PST) > From: Chetan Pandya > Reply-To: pandyacus@sbcglobal.net > Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > From: Eli Zaretskii > > > > > Wouldn't it make more sense for it to be DOS_NT? > > > > Not unless you show me a use case where multi-tty features > > don't work > > in the MS-DOS port of Emacs. I have yet to see any Lisp > > code that > > wouldn't DTRT in the DOS port because of this. > > I can show where it does not work if you can show me that DOS port can be built from the sources as they exist. Yes, it can; see msdos/INSTALL.