From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (featurep 'multi-tty) => t on Windows Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:24:00 -0500 Message-ID: References: <610112.22856.qm@web83202.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229038643 26611 80.91.229.12 (11 Dec 2008 23:37:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:37:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: pandyacus@sbcglobal.net Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 12 00:38:25 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LAv6j-00044V-Rv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:38:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42868 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LAv5Y-0004gT-P8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:37:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LAutc-0004vq-6i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:24:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LAuta-0004sx-Od for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:24:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36963 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LAuta-0004sm-JN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:24:38 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:46367) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LAuta-0002Ar-8A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:24:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LAusy-0003io-93; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:24:00 -0500 In-reply-to: <610112.22856.qm@web83202.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (message from Chetan Pandya on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:35:19 -0800 (PST)) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106822 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:35:19 -0800 (PST) > From: Chetan Pandya > Cc: Emacs Devel > Reply-To: pandyacus@sbcglobal.net > > Wouldn't it make more sense for it to be DOS_NT? Not unless you show me a use case where multi-tty features don't work in the MS-DOS port of Emacs. I have yet to see any Lisp code that wouldn't DTRT in the DOS port because of this.