From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Specifying mode in file variables trouble Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:34:33 -0400 Message-ID: References: <48D44761.6000809@gmail.com> <87ljxny6n8.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <48D44C79.9020004@gmail.com> <48D63F30.8060102@gmail.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1222040223 1730 80.91.229.12 (21 Sep 2008 23:37:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 22 01:38:00 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KhYV3-0007Ck-BG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:37:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53589 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KhYU1-0007gG-Cw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:36:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KhYTw-0007ei-RT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:36:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KhYTu-0007e0-H1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:36:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50951 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KhYTu-0007dx-AN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:36:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:33229) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KhYTu-0001w1-5l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:36:46 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KhYRl-0002EM-Uh; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:34:33 -0400 In-reply-to: <48D63F30.8060102@gmail.com> (lennart.borgman@gmail.com) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104018 Archived-At: Ok, I am convinced. I have changed the name convention so that multi major modes now ends in "-mumamo-mode" (instead of the old "-mumamo"). That is good. However, I would like to suggest that in some cases there is no need to put `-mumamo' in these names. If this is the right mode for a certain language or type of file, known as FOO, then this command should be called FOO-mode.