From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#961: 23.0.60; Excess consing visiting files Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:08:05 -0400 Message-ID: References: <48C90392.7090604@gmx.at> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org, 961@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1221154079 14514 80.91.229.12 (11 Sep 2008 17:27:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 961@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com To: martin rudalics , 961@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 11 19:28:54 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KdpyI-0000Z4-Li for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:28:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46958 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KdpxI-0003DA-0H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:27:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KdpxD-0003BL-3L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:27:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KdpxA-00039S-OT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:27:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57824 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KdpxA-00039G-Iy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:27:36 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:59714) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kdpx9-0000QH-TY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:27:36 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m8BHRX10004554; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:27:33 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m8BHFAuK032696; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:15:10 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: "Richard M. Stallman" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:15:10 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 961 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 961-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B961.122115299830366 (code B ref 961); Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:15:10 +0000 Original-Received: (at 961) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 11 Sep 2008 17:09:58 +0000 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m8BH9tDw030354 for <961@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:09:56 -0700 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KdpeH-0004SE-Li; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:08:05 -0400 In-reply-to: <48C90392.7090604@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:40:02 +0200) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:27:37 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20485 Archived-At: It might be completely unrelated but did you look at Bug#122? Len Trigg reports that he had 200 open buffers "(about 170 of which are named like *code-conversion-work*)". I just saw that a few minutes ago. Just now I have one buffer called ` *code-conversion-work*' and one called ` *code-converting-work*'. I think these names are confusingly similar; they should be changed so that it is clear why they are different and what each one is used for. But there is only one of each. This certainly does not explain why, shortly after `emacs -Q', visiting that short file makes 40k of strings. Next time it gets slow, I will investigate what hidden buffers I have,