From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Release plans Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:21:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: <10697146.3630221218551689983.JavaMail.www@wwinf4615> <20080812171404.GB7999@muc.de> <20080813092057.GA3010@muc.de> <20080814083817.GA2593@muc.de> <877iak7xfp.fsf@skyscraper.fehenstaub.lan> <873al79akr.fsf@skyscraper.fehenstaub.lan> <48A5BAD7.8030302@emf.net> <87d4k6qm9g.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1219148607 5202 80.91.229.12 (19 Aug 2008 12:23:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:23:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lord@emf.net, hannes@saeurebad.de, joakim@verona.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org, ams@gnu.org, acm@muc.de To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 19 14:24:18 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KVQFx-00018S-5P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:24:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44351 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KVQEz-0002Vh-Sb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:23:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KVQEo-0002Ru-CM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KVQEn-0002RR-7c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:23:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36274 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KVQEm-0002RJ-Sg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:23:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:44331) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KVQEn-0003x8-0d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:23:01 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KVQDV-0003wN-Gt; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:21:41 -0400 In-reply-to: <87d4k6qm9g.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (stephen@xemacs.org) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102648 Archived-At: I will remind you that that was good enough for XEmacs and Qt in your opinion. What opinion are you talking about? I do not in general approve of the decisions of the XEmacs developers, and they don't wait on my approval any more than I wait on yours.