From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard M Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Idea for syntax-ppss. Is it new? Could it be any good? Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:27:06 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20080726214429.GB3623@muc.de> <20080727145058.GA1598@muc.de> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217212092 26807 80.91.229.12 (28 Jul 2008 02:28:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 28 04:28:59 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KNITr-0004bN-Hr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 04:28:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55468 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KNISx-000708-9l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KNISs-0006yG-AQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:27:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KNISr-0006y4-Il for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:27:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37883 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KNISr-0006xx-6r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:27:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:52086) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KNISq-0002aB-TK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:27:57 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KNIS2-0004Vw-63; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:27:06 -0400 In-reply-to: <20080727145058.GA1598@muc.de> (message from Alan Mackenzie on Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:50:58 +0000) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101614 Archived-At: It caches the state for several positions, but I don't think they're at regular positions. I don't understand the detailed workings of the routine at the moment. If we have a cache, it might be more efficient to cache the locations where beginnings of defuns were found.