From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: adding consistent extra symbols to input methods (cyrillic-*, croatian-*, slov*, czech-* etc.) input methods Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:43:24 +0900 Message-ID: References: <86lk19mmua.fsf@lifelogs.com> <485298A4.30000@gnu.org> <867ict8awn.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87tzfvj16y.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <86lk12zee7.fsf@lifelogs.com> <86r6acqbif.fsf@lifelogs.com> <864p76lp60.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <87ej66ubkv.fsf@jurta.org> <8763rh73l5.fsf@jurta.org> <87ej5yqs5j.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87fxqd4te3.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1216010673 10492 80.91.229.12 (14 Jul 2008 04:44:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 04:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, eliz@gnu.org, tzz@lifelogs.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 14 06:45:17 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KIFvg-0005WC-FJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 06:44:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55519 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KIFuo-0002va-4g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:43:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KIFuj-0002vV-7Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:43:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KIFuh-0002vJ-Bb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:43:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42334 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KIFuh-0002vG-6g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:43:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:56559) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KIFuW-0005Jy-BH; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:43:40 -0400 Original-Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m6E4hXur015903; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:43:33 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m6E4hW9Q017157; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:43:32 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m6E4hOFY029627; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:43:24 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken.m17n.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KIFuG-000119-63; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:43:24 +0900 In-reply-to: (message from Miles Bader on Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:18:06 +0900) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:100666 Archived-At: In article , Miles Bader writes: > Juri Linkov writes: > > activate-preposition-input-method -> activate-additional-input-method > > inactivate-preposition-input-method -> inactivate-additional-input-method > > local-input-method-list -> current-additional-input-method-list > Those names seem to have rather different implications though... > `activate-additional-input-method' makes it sound vaguely like the new > input method will somehow be "equal" to the existing input method, > whereas kenichi's name somewhat implies otherwise, that the new input > method being activated is somehow "special" (and I think also suggests > that it will be "subsidiary" to any main input method). > Which of those is true? My original patch intends that "preposition" input methods are what handled before the normal input method (as documented). Juri Linkov writes: > global-input-method-list -> remove this variable since there is > no global variant of `current-input-method'. ??? A preposition input method can be activated globally when recorded in global-input-method-list. In that case, in any buffer, when you activate a normal input method, that preposition input method is also activated automatically. Isn't it useful? --- Kenichi Handa handa@ni.aist.go.jp