From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard M Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "no-conversion" coding system (was: ^M in the info files) Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:57:49 -0400 Message-ID: References: <484F1FAB.6070005@gmail.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1215647996 30001 80.91.229.12 (9 Jul 2008 23:59:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 23:59:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, handa@m17n.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 10 02:00:42 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KGjaU-0003A1-0T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:00:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60937 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KGjZc-0003D8-Ds for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:59:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KGjYA-0002QP-82 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:58:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KGjY9-0002Pq-Hl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:58:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52190 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KGjY9-0002Pl-FL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:58:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:38624) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KGjY9-0003jF-8G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:58:17 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KGjXh-0000U4-Jl; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:57:49 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 09 Jul 2008 10:54:28 -0400) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:100508 Archived-At: I mean, this is a misnomer which gives the illusion that there is such a thing as "no conversion", even though in reality there always is some conversion going on. `no-conversion' used to really mean no conversion. Why has that changed?