From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Lost antialias? Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:46:33 +0900 Message-ID: References: <485230EB.9070203@alice.it> <48546807.8010406@alice.it> <87abhmgmko.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1213663636 27472 80.91.229.12 (17 Jun 2008 00:47:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:47:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: miles@gnu.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com, angelo.graziosi@alice.it, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 17 02:47:59 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K8PMc-0004Ij-3x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:47:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38239 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K8PLn-0006S7-Rl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:47:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K8PLj-0006Qg-FM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:47:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K8PLi-0006Ou-5q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33770 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K8PLh-0006Of-Pi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:47:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:49756) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K8PLb-0001Az-Pd; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:46:56 -0400 Original-Received: from rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.123]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m5H0lWUi023873; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:47:32 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp2.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m5H0kl0K007097; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:46:47 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m5H0kXUM015471; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:46:33 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken.m17n.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K8PLF-0002EJ-MH; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:46:33 +0900 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:32:39 -0400) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:99324 Archived-At: In article , Stefan Monnier writes: >>>>> Is there any reason to have x,xft by default, instead of xft,x? >>> > Backward compatibility. >>> Is this really very important? >>> I suspect many (maybe most) people will _want_ the "incompatible" font >>> when there's a conflict. > > Until the code gets more stable, I'd like to keep backward > > compatibility where it's easy to do that. > What's the recommended way to change this option in .emacs? (push '(font-backend xft x) default-frame-alist) --- Kenichi Handa handa@ni.aist.go.jp