From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Lost antialias? Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:36:37 +0900 Message-ID: References: <485230EB.9070203@alice.it> <48546807.8010406@alice.it> <87abhmgmko.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1213616257 25764 80.91.229.12 (16 Jun 2008 11:37:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:37:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, angelo.graziosi@alice.it To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 16 13:38:21 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K8D2L-0006r8-Mb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:38:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46555 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K8D1X-0006d5-L0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:37:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K8D1H-0006Xp-JW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:37:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K8D1F-0006XB-QX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:37:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51846 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K8D1F-0006X0-JI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:37:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:36532) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K8D1A-0003mp-8w; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:37:00 -0400 Original-Received: from rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.123]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m5GBbbCt008277; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:37:37 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp4.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m5GBapRr019919; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:36:51 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp4.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m5GBabpX027986; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:36:37 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken.m17n.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K8D0n-0005wr-O7; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:36:37 +0900 In-reply-to: (message from Miles Bader on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:30:42 +0900) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:99300 Archived-At: In article , Miles Bader writes: > Kenichi Handa writes: >>> Is there any reason to have x,xft by default, instead of xft,x? > > > > Backward compatibility. > Is this really very important? > I suspect many (maybe most) people will _want_ the "incompatible" font > when there's a conflict. Until the code gets more stable, I'd like to keep backward compatibility where it's easy to do that. And, at least, I think Xft backend is slower when you runs Emacs remotely via narrow network. --- Kenichi Handa handa@ni.aist.go.jp