From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: testing for a remote file to include file on a Windows mapped drive Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:50:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87bq781bf7.fsf@gmx.de> <000a01c8a314$5fff7630$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <000d01c8a324$97820590$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <000f01c8a334$b2a40660$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <000101c8a37f$eeb543d0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208850724 11761 80.91.229.12 (22 Apr 2008 07:52:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jasonr@gnu.org, michael.albinus@gmx.de, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 22 09:52:39 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JoDIs-0007CR-Ha for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:52:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JoDIC-0000Ec-Tk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:51:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JoDHv-00007E-RX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:51:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JoDHq-0008Vc-A6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:51:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JoDHp-0008VT-PT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:51:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JoDHp-0006mi-HN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:51:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JoCKj-0004Xy-EF; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:50:29 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:46:10 -0400) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95745 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, jasonr@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:46:10 -0400 > > >> This may require some changes in file-relative-name, because this one > >> does use file-remote-p in a more specific way, but everything else I've > >> looked at uses file-remote-p as a way to test "fast&reliable or not". > > > Like I said, it's a mystery to me why you insist on changing > > file-remote-p for a different semantics. > > I'm saying it's not a different semantics. I'm obviously failing to explain myself, because I was trying to say that the current semantics is: ``remote'' files are files accessed via a handler, as opposed to normal file I/O API (`open', `read', etc.).