From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: display-buffer-other-frame - useful? doc string? Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:16:07 -0400 Message-ID: References: <002401c8820f$7d6042c0$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> <002d01c88231$c6120fe0$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205169509 20230 80.91.229.12 (10 Mar 2008 17:18:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:18:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 10 18:18:49 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JYldn-00043q-3j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:18:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYldE-0007IE-Pw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:17:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYlbd-0006PZ-To for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:16:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYlbc-0006OU-3h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:16:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYlbb-0006OR-UK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:16:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYlbb-00027W-Qo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:16:07 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JYlbb-0007BW-E5; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:16:07 -0400 In-reply-to: <002d01c88231$c6120fe0$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> (drew.adams@oracle.com) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92065 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21511 Archived-At: I agree with everything you said. However, I don't see that such a command would be very useful. Maybe the best thing to do is to remove it altogether It exists just for the sake of symmetry of the command set, since this is the natural thing for C-x 5 C-o to do. If having it is painful, we can get rid of it.