From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [asvanyi@inf.elte.hu: Latex, utf8, and verbatim in GNU Emacs 22.1.1] Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:25:57 -0500 Message-ID: References: <47C9E50D.2080208@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204478954 20038 80.91.229.12 (2 Mar 2008 17:29:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 17:29:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 02 18:29:40 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JVs00-0003m8-PU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 18:29:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JVrzT-0001Tx-QL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:28:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JVrwn-0000Kw-So for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:26:02 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JVrwm-0000Hq-BX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:26:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JVrwk-0000H0-Kj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:25:58 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JVrwk-0007Fw-FQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:25:58 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JVrwj-0002Wf-Uu; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:25:57 -0500 In-reply-to: <47C9E50D.2080208@gnu.org> (message from Jason Rumney on Sat, 01 Mar 2008 23:21:49 +0000) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91078 Archived-At: > A week ago I asked people to DTRT and ack, but nobody did. You didn't ack the message, so I got a reminder and I did not know the problem had been dealt with. It is important to ack the message that asks for an ack, because that turns off the reminder. Perhaps the new maintainer team will be able to keep track in their heads, or use a bug tracker to do it. But please do ack the message that asks for an ack.