From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: [22.1.90]: Point before start of properties Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 05:57:16 -0500 Message-ID: References: <6EE216E1AA959543A555C60FF34FB76702E48034@maileube01.misys.global.ad> <87wspcj0ou.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <6EE216E1AA959543A555C60FF34FB76702EED4A1@maileube01.misys.global.ad> <6EE216E1AA959543A555C60FF34FB76702EEDA6E@maileube01.misys.global.ad> <6EE216E1AA959543A555C60FF34FB7670300E86B@maileube01.misys.global.ad> <6EE216E1AA959543A555C60FF34FB7670305B82C@maileube01.misys.global.ad> <6EE216E1AA959543A555C60FF34FB7670305BF82@maileube01.misys.global.ad> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203937074 12879 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2008 10:57:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 25 11:58:16 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JTb2D-0006Tt-Ue for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:58:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JTb1i-0000yD-4B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 05:57:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JTb1K-0000oG-Hx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 05:57:18 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JTb1J-0000nQ-86 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 05:57:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JTb1I-0000nD-QT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 05:57:16 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JTb1I-0006iE-GU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 05:57:16 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JTb1I-0007OT-0D; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 05:57:16 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:59:23 +0200) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90379 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21291 Archived-At: Yes, I need all the extra performance I can get, since the fact that "-O2" gives code that cannot be debugged reliably means that I have to ship software compiled with "-O1" (because I'm unwilling to ship code I didn't test, and I don't want to test code I cannot debug). I suggest you make a specific proposal and send it to the GCC discussion list. The option could be called -Odebug, but the real issue is to decide which optimizations to include.