From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Enabling Transient Mark Mode by default Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:29:12 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87myq4saw1.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <20080219190127.GA1106@muc.de> <877ih0o9dx.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <85ablvftqe.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <8e24944a0802201130y1601cd6dvf22a8089e2de97f7@mail.gmail.com> <858x1fe6fc.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <8e24944a0802201241o4a2a70d0xb823b3fa27692bfd@mail.gmail.com> <87zltujk8n.fsf@jurta.org> <873arkpj2n.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203795280 28745 80.91.229.12 (23 Feb 2008 19:34:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 19:34:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wilde@sha-bang.de, david.delaharpe.golden@gmail.com, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@jurta.org, dann@ics.uci.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, storm@cua.dk, acm@muc.de, miles@gnu.org To: Bastien Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 23 20:35:04 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JT09G-0004Kw-59 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:35:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JT08k-0004bu-EC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:34:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JT03f-0001Uk-Fy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:29:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JT03d-0001TU-9o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:29:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JT03d-0001TQ-6J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:29:13 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JT03d-0001k2-6I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:29:13 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JT03c-0005AM-Jf; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:29:12 -0500 In-reply-to: <873arkpj2n.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (message from Bastien on Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:17:36 +0000) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90141 Archived-At: And now I realize that, if C-SPC C-SPC temporarily negates the value of `transient-mark-mode', then swapping the commands behind C-SPC and C-SPC C-SPC [2] is strictly an equivalent of setting `transient-mark-mode' to non-nil by default. Or am I missing something? The proposal I'm talking about is that Transient Mark mode should effectively swap the meanings of C-SPC and C-SPC C-SPC. Perhaps there was a misunderstanding about that.