From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (aset UNIBYTE-STRING MULTIBYTE-CHAR) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:29:35 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203280192 27616 80.91.229.12 (17 Feb 2008 20:29:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 17 21:30:16 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JQq9O-0004nz-F1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 21:30:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQq8u-00074n-1M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:29:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQq8p-00074M-DJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:29:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQq8n-00073W-55 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:29:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQq8n-00073T-2J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:29:37 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JQq8m-0000x0-SZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:29:36 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JQq8l-0002Ns-Tf; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:29:35 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:33:24 -0500) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89389 Archived-At: > If we are going to inhibit aset on multibyte strings, I think we > should inhibit aset on any strings to avoid a further confusion. > I think someone should try making it work. > The way I suggested should not be terribly hard. The problem is the following: while it can be made to work, it will be inefficient. That inefficiency may or may not be important in any given context. Fixing it in casefiddle is definitely desirable. But is it worth breaking all such packages just so that they will optimize an operation that might not use much of the time anyway?