From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs
Subject: Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:22:21 -0500
Message-ID: <E1JQjTJ-0002po-Tu@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <tntr6frks1f.fsf@maru.green.cert.org>
	<47A93D3A.90308@gnu.org>	<tntfxw69mu4.fsf@maru.green.cert.org>
	<47AA7C97.2020505@gnu.org>	<kaprv9s6bb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<buor6fpjobu.fsf@dhapc248.dev.necel.com>
	<E1JNKe9-0000Lr-Jm@fencepost.gnu.org> <47B65876.7040009@ig.com.br>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203254704 15438 80.91.229.12 (17 Feb 2008 13:25:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:25:04 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: rgm@gnu.org, rv@gnu.org, mwd@cert.org, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org,
	miles@gnu.org
To: Vinicius Jose Latorre <viniciusjl@ig.com.br>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 17 14:25:26 2008
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1JQjWH-0006pJ-RW
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:25:26 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JQjVn-0000Ea-Bt
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:24:55 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JQjTQ-0007H4-Nd
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:22:28 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JQjTO-0007Ey-P2
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:22:28 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQjTO-0007Ee-JU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:22:26 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1JQjTO-00018e-9Y
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:22:26 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1JQjTJ-0002po-Tu; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:22:21 -0500
In-reply-to: <47B65876.7040009@ig.com.br> (message from Vinicius Jose Latorre
	on Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:28:54 -0300)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89332 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21152
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/89332>

    Well, indeed the old whitespace-buffer had reported
    where the bogus whitespace had happened.

    Instead of reporting, the new whitespace-mode
    displays visually the bogus whitespace.

Ok, we know what the old whitespace-buffer does.
And we know what the new whitespace-mode does.

    Is it ok if the new whitespace-buffer is removed?

What does the new whitespace-buffer do?  How does it differ
from whitespace-mode?

Can you make it provide the features of the old whitespace-buffer?