From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:53:07 -0500
Message-ID: <E1JQFz1-0005qV-CX@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1JOYo5-00081A-VF@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87ve4sqsqe.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <m3myq4qp14.fsf@cam.ac.uk>
	<E1JPiY3-0006Hs-DB@fencepost.gnu.org> <m363wrqf4b.fsf@cam.ac.uk>
	<18356.54892.186541.669277@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
	<m3myq3nkso.fsf@cam.ac.uk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203141208 1232 80.91.229.12 (16 Feb 2008 05:53:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 05:53:28 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 16 06:53:51 2008
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1JQFzi-0005Cw-QD
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:53:50 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JQFzE-000551-P4
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:53:20 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JQFz5-00053t-Jn
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:53:11 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JQFz3-00052r-03
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:53:10 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQFz2-00052h-Os
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:53:08 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1JQFz2-0005aI-AJ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:53:08 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1JQFz1-0005qV-CX; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:53:07 -0500
In-reply-to: <m3myq3nkso.fsf@cam.ac.uk> (message from Leo on Fri, 15 Feb 2008
	00:08:23 +0000)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89219
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/89219>

    This is true. It is probably not worth the trouble, particularly there
    are tons of python editors that are far superior than Emacs. To name
    one, SciTE.

What is superior about it?