From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (aset UNIBYTE-STRING MULTIBYTE-CHAR) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:42:39 -0500 Message-ID: References: <871w7g91dz.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202964206 6789 80.91.229.12 (14 Feb 2008 04:43:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 04:43:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: handa@ni.aist.go.jp, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 14 05:43:49 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JPVwr-0006bb-1L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 05:43:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JPVwN-000345-CJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:43:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JPVvl-0002pG-9z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:42:41 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JPVvk-0002oy-AL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:42:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JPVvk-0002ot-4s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:42:40 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JPVvj-0001Q9-V4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:42:40 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JPVvj-0005jw-Hh; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:42:39 -0500 In-reply-to: <871w7g91dz.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (stephen@xemacs.org) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89045 Archived-At: > PS: I see bindat.el uses string-make-unibyte is a similar way to the > place where we recently switched to unibyte-string, except that th > source is an array rather than a list, and I was thinking: wouldn't > it make sense to allow `apply' to take an array of args rather than > a list of args? How Pythonic! I see no harm in it.