From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: charprop.el and uni-*.el Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:32:53 +0900 Message-ID: References: <47B01DFB.5050905@gnu.org> <47B163B7.6030601@gnu.org> <47B165F5.2050801@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202881016 26639 80.91.229.12 (13 Feb 2008 05:36:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:36:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 13 06:37:18 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JPAJ3-0001BU-Lz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:37:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JPAIZ-0007E3-Ln for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:36:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JPAIU-0007DX-CD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:36:42 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JPAIS-0007Cb-Fc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:36:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JPAIS-0007CP-4E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:36:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JPAIS-000127-4l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:36:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JPAIH-0004pR-P1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:36:39 -0500 Original-Received: from rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.123]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m1D5WtIm013126; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:32:58 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp2.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m1D5WsxH000466; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:32:54 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m1D5Wr6B011376; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:32:53 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken.m17n.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JPAEn-0006Ad-PP; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:32:53 +0900 In-reply-to: <47B165F5.2050801@gmail.com> (lennart.borgman@gmail.com) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88934 Archived-At: In article <47B165F5.2050801@gmail.com>, "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: > Here are some errors I got right now during bootstrap after a fresh > checkout: > Wrote c:/eclean/bld/emacs/lisp/international/quail.elc > Wrote c:/eclean/bld/emacs/lisp/international/robin.elc > Wrote c:/eclean/bld/emacs/lisp/international/titdic-cnv.elc > File local-variables error: (error "Local variables entry is missing the > suffix") > In toplevel form: > international/uni-bidi.el:492:34:Error: End of file during parsing > File local-variables error: (error "Local variables entry is missing the > suffix") I don't see that error. "Juanma Barranquero" writes: > I think the problem was not related to the uni-* files (it happened > before they were committed), but it has stopped happening now (perhaps > because of the regeneration of ldefs-boot.el). So, perhaps, you have to regenerate loaddefs.el from ldefs-boot. --- Kenichi Handa handa@ni.aist.go.jp