From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:15:29 -0500 Message-ID: References: <47A93D3A.90308@gnu.org> <47AA7C97.2020505@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202444190 26401 80.91.229.12 (8 Feb 2008 04:16:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 04:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, rv@gnu.org, mwd@cert.org, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 08 05:16:52 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JNKfQ-0000Ym-OV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:16:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JNKex-0003iV-QN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:16:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JNKeE-0003DW-AM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:15:34 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JNKeC-0003BP-Ia for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:15:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JNKeC-0003B9-9z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:15:32 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JNKeC-000587-5v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:15:32 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JNKe9-0000Lr-Jm; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:15:29 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Miles Bader on Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:03:01 +0900) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88490 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20939 Archived-At: I gather that Richard wanted the new functionality to use the "whitespace" name, which makes some sense, but it seems seems to have been done rather clumsily in some cases. E.g. the new "whitespace-buffer" command seems completely different than the old "whitespace-buffer" command, and really there seems no good reason for it. Vinicius, can you fix up these wrinkles?