From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation* Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:11:42 -0500 Message-ID: References: <6EE216E1AA959543A555C60FF34FB76702CD2B19@maileube01.misys.global.ad> <6EE216E1AA959543A555C60FF34FB76702D254AF@maileube01.misys.global.ad> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202314370 4043 80.91.229.12 (6 Feb 2008 16:12:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:12:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Simon.Marshall@misys.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 06 17:13:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JMmtR-0006zG-4C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:13:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JMmsy-0005gY-Ix for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:12:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JMmsF-0004jr-0S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:11:47 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JMmsD-0004gu-9s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:11:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JMmsD-0004gb-1v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:11:45 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JMmsC-0004LL-T3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:11:44 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JMmsA-00047i-7k; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:11:42 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:15:05 -0500) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88336 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20899 Archived-At: > I would guess that a default of t for compilation-scroll-output would be > better that the current default of nil, but YMMV. When I'm compiling, I > generally want to see progress, so I generally want Emacs to scroll the > window for me. Agreed, I disagree. I find that I can't read the output of compilation if it scrolls. Compilers are too fast these days! Now, if we could slow them down, maybe it would be ok to scroll the output. Any ideas?