From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:33:18 +0900 Message-ID: References: <47A46CA9.40703@gnu.org> <47A4DAED.4000801@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202128458 24405 80.91.229.12 (4 Feb 2008 12:34:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:34:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mindcooler@gmail.com, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 04 13:34:39 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JM0Wh-0002QF-TT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:34:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JM0WF-0002Rn-HI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 07:33:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JM0WB-0002Rf-L0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 07:33:47 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JM0W9-0002Qh-B0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 07:33:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JM0W9-0002QX-6s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 07:33:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JM0W0-00073W-GP; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 07:33:37 -0500 Original-Received: from rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.123]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m14CXUSc014311; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:33:30 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp4.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m14CXUkd014325; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:33:30 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp4.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m14CXIZZ008092; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:33:18 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken.m17n.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JM0Vi-0007p2-Lc; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:33:18 +0900 In-reply-to: <47A4DAED.4000801@gnu.org> (message from Jason Rumney on Sat, 02 Feb 2008 21:04:45 +0000) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88155 Archived-At: In article <47A4DAED.4000801@gnu.org>, Jason Rumney writes: > > Do we need to fix the build without it (which currently fails on > > Windows), or should we make --enable-font-backend the default? > > > I think the original plan was to make the new font backend the default > after the initial flood of post-merge bug reports died down, but if the > old font code is going to be a major source of such reports, maybe it is > better to make it the default sooner. I agree. And I also had the plan of deleting regacy font handling codes as soon as it is supported also on non-Unix non-GNU-Linux system (i.e. Windows and Mac). When Emacs.app (Mac Cocoa port) is merged into the trunk, I'd like to start working on it. --- Kenichi Handa handa@ni.aist.go.jp