From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: linum.el? Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:52:31 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201726371 3801 80.91.229.12 (30 Jan 2008 20:52:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:52:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 30 21:53:12 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JKJve-0007op-V3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:53:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JKJvD-0001wx-Re for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:52:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JKJv8-0001tA-VL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:52:34 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JKJv7-0001rT-PP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:52:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JKJv7-0001rH-KM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:52:33 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JKJv7-0000De-EQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:52:33 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JKJv5-0006Jk-SI; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:52:31 -0500 In-reply-to: (lekktu@gmail.com) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87795 Archived-At: > Could people stop adding new features to the 22.x branch? That's a nice answer to my asking... BTW, where were you when socks.el, css-mode.el, vera-mode.el, vc-hg.el, vc-git.el, vc-bzr.el, vc-mtn.el, verilog-mode.el and blank-mode.el were added to the EMACS_22_BASE branch? It's not out of the question to add a modular new feature to Emacs 22.2. If it can't break anything else, it isn't risky. But we may not want to add any more of them now, since we want to start pretesting it now.