From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:17:38 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20071230122217.3CA84830B9A@snark.thyrsus.com> <4pd9g15e.fsf@blue.sea.net> <87r6g7z3m2.fsf@everybody.org> <87odbbngr8.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20080125231308.57E9A30303@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <873aslsck9.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <85bq77yxpf.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <18332.58450.182059.702244@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201504748 21784 80.91.229.12 (28 Jan 2008 07:19:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 07:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, ams@gnu.org, stephen@xemacs.org, miles@gnu.org To: Nick Roberts Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 28 08:19:28 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JJOH8-0008U6-Os for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:19:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JJOGh-0005N7-UH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:18:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JJOFR-0004hr-2D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:17:41 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JJOFP-0004gy-IV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:17:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JJOFP-0004gq-E4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:17:39 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JJOFO-0002fy-Sd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:17:39 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JJOFO-0001GA-7l; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:17:38 -0500 In-reply-to: <18332.58450.182059.702244@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (message from Nick Roberts on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:06:42 +1300) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87687 Archived-At: I'm interested to know what it means to be part of the GNU Project because I work on both Emacs and GDB but, in practice, I can see no formal synergy between the two, or preference towards each other. We should be designing them both to work well together. For instance, the GDB developers should pay attention to what your Emacs work needs. (I'm not sure whether the terms "formal synergy" or "preference towards" fit this.)