From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:07:40 -0500
Message-ID: <E1JGsd2-0007cx-RI@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20071230122217.3CA84830B9A@snark.thyrsus.com>
	<4pd9g15e.fsf@blue.sea.net>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200906531 14292 80.91.229.12 (21 Jan 2008 09:08:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:08:51 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: jaalto@cante.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 21 10:09:10 2008
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1JGseN-0000no-Fw
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:09:04 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JGsdy-0007nI-3T
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:08:38 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JGsd5-00074h-51
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:07:43 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JGsd3-00073g-Ki
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:07:42 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JGsd3-00073c-Gi
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:07:41 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1JGsd3-0001oL-6p
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:07:41 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1JGsd2-0007cx-RI; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:07:40 -0500
In-reply-to: <4pd9g15e.fsf@blue.sea.net> (message from Jari Aalto on Sat, 19
	Jan 2008 19:45:17 +0200)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87193
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/87193>

Git:

      * The weak point is UI: it is very complicated. Currently
	requires very steep learning curve even from users that
	have prior experience (CVS/SVN stc.)

Does VC in Emacs overcome that problem?

    - Bzr seems to take second place. It has a long term progression path
      and support, very strict code quality and clearly defined
      development phases.

BZR may become a GNU package, which would be a reason to prefer it.