From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RFC: status icon support Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:26:40 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200801120157.m0C1v6WL020654@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200801121352.m0CDqERq011212@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <85zlvb3yhn.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <86ve5wixa5.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200331670 31851 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2008 17:27:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tromey@redhat.com, schwab@suse.de, dann@ics.uci.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 14 18:28:13 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JET6a-0006lh-2R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:28:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JET6B-0007fn-QH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:27:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JET59-0006GA-K2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:26:43 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JET57-0006Cs-L9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:26:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JET57-0006CR-Bw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:26:41 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JET57-0003Dg-3l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:26:41 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JET56-0003Tr-Le; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:26:40 -0500 In-reply-to: <86ve5wixa5.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:14:42 +0100) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:86900 Archived-At: > Compilers are not allowed to accept this style of declaration without > warning. > > Not allowed? Nobody can stop us! What about "in C99" did you not understand? The term "allow" gives the impression that standards can give us orders that we have to obey. In GNU, we often follow standards but we never obey them.