From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:06:51 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200801031805.m03I5SBf022748@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200801050901.m0591mQj011970@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <20080105143415.GG30869@thyrsus.com> <200801061037.m06AbIRD004966@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200801070259.m072xY0s005194@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <20080107032649.GD9473@thyrsus.com> <20080107125420.GC9920@thyrsus.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199819266 21398 80.91.229.12 (8 Jan 2008 19:07:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:07:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tromey@redhat.com, harsanyi@mac.com, dann@ics.uci.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: esr@thyrsus.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 08 20:08:06 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JCJnu-0004li-S8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:08:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JCJnX-0003yf-Hx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:07:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JCJmn-0003Rl-BI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:06:53 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JCJmm-0003Qe-FR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:06:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JCJmm-0003QW-73 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:06:52 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JCJml-0001KN-TE; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:06:51 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JCJml-0003ZQ-7L; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:06:51 -0500 In-reply-to: <20080107125420.GC9920@thyrsus.com> (esr@thyrsus.com) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:86571 Archived-At: > > > If we introduce a new non-dired thingy, I suggest we don't even try to > > > provide a non-terse mode. > > What does "non-terse mode" mean in this context? Showing unregistred files, basically. If this feature is disconnected from Dired, I guess there is no need to implement that mode. It follows there is an advantage in staying with Dired: continuing to offer that mode.