From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Why Emacs needs a modern bug tracker
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 06:30:43 -0500
Message-ID: <E1JBqBn-0004N9-OZ@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <u7iiouuxf.fsf@gnu.org> <20080105182456.GR30869@thyrsus.com>
	<uve68t481.fsf@gnu.org> <20080105214810.GZ30869@thyrsus.com>
	<utzlruae6.fsf@gnu.org> <20080105233923.GH30869@thyrsus.com>
	<18304.10442.537860.246188@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
	<87k5mnoge1.fsf@catnip.gol.com>
	<18304.21595.549190.232362@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
	<85bq7zjjgb.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <20080106155950.GV30869@thyrsus.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199705493 5730 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2008 11:31:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:31:33 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: esr@snark.thyrsus.com, nickrob@snap.net.nz, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
	eliz@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org
To: esr@thyrsus.com
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 07 12:31:52 2008
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1JBqCr-0003xO-9W
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:31:49 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JBqCU-00050i-C4
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 06:31:26 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JBqBq-0004dC-W2
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 06:30:47 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JBqBp-0004cE-J7
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 06:30:46 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JBqBp-0004bz-AJ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 06:30:45 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1JBqBp-0002Sv-CA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 06:30:45 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1JBqBn-0004N9-OZ; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 06:30:43 -0500
In-reply-to: <20080106155950.GV30869@thyrsus.com> (esr@thyrsus.com)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:86454
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/86454>

    Agreed.  That would have the advantage of lowering the Savannah admins'
    maintainance load after the transition.

If Bugzilla is superior, it would provide an advantage to the projects
hosted on Savannah.  But how would installing Bugzilla on Savannah
reduce the Savannah admins' maintainance load?  I would like to
understand this, because maybe it will be an argument I should
present.