From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: strange byte compiler behavior Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:09:23 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200712312055.lBVKteSa012881@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200801021948.m02JmJ1Y005211@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200801022317.m02NHVSC017328@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199643157 32164 80.91.229.12 (6 Jan 2008 18:12:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 18:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dann@ics.uci.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 06 19:12:57 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JBZzQ-0000vU-LT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:12:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JBZz3-0008QM-OK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:12:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JBZw5-0006XR-P6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:09:25 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JBZw4-0006Vn-8P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:09:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JBZw3-0006VZ-VJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:09:24 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JBZw3-0000wg-OV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:09:23 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JBZw3-0001oZ-Ds; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:09:23 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:00:41 -0500) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:86359 Archived-At: They are, but elsewhere and the byte-compiler only knows about it via `boundp': it doesn't keep its own list of defvar'd variables. Indeed, that is true. But we COULD make it check for a variable doc string instead. The effect would be that variables defvar'd in another file with no doc string would get warnings. Maybe that is not a bad result.