From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: rfn-eshadow
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:54:45 -0500
Message-ID: <E1JB1zZ-00067D-NS@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1JAMjL-00019Y-1Z@fencepost.gnu.org> <87k5mq60y8.fsf@jurta.org>
	<jwvhchu1f6e.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199512966 21836 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2008 06:02:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 06:02:46 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 05 07:03:02 2008
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1JB27Z-00007o-Al
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:03:01 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JB27C-0006FH-O9
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 01:02:38 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JB1zc-0002HZ-EU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:54:48 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JB1za-0002H0-Ll
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:54:47 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JB1za-0002Gt-9j
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:54:46 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1JB1za-0003dc-6T
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:54:46 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1JB1zZ-00067D-NS; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:54:45 -0500
In-reply-to: <jwvhchu1f6e.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:51:37 -0500)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:86113
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/86113>

    No, it is perfectly right for rfn-eshadow to treat it as a file name,
    since that's what rfn-eshadow is all about: to improve file-name entry.

I think you are right.  If the supposed URL is going to be interpreted
as a file name, then it is right for rfn-eshadow to treat it as a file
name too.