From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: ChangeLog policy for same-day changes to a file?
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:50:24 -0500
Message-ID: <E1JAMiW-0008Od-33@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87hchwr4d4.fsf@red-bean.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199354299 1513 80.91.229.12 (3 Jan 2008 09:58:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:58:19 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 03 10:58:39 2008
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1JAMqN-0001Tu-Jf
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 10:58:31 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JAMq1-0001mL-C4
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:58:09 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JAMiZ-0005az-42
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:50:27 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JAMiX-0005Zv-DJ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:50:26 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAMiW-0005Zh-QT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:50:24 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1JAMiW-0000oK-Gy
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:50:24 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1JAMiW-0008Od-33; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:50:24 -0500
In-reply-to: <87hchwr4d4.fsf@red-bean.com> (message from Karl Fogel on Wed, 02
	Jan 2008 00:58:15 -0800)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:85976
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/85976>

    Obviously, they represent separate CVS commits to doc-view.el, but on
    the same day, so Tassilo put them into the same ChangeLog entry.  The
    result is counterintuitive, but I'm not sure what else he should do.

This is the way we do it.
There's nothing wrong with it.

    It's just confusing because there is an implicit one-to-one mapping
    between ChangeLog top-level entries and CVS commits.

We have never made that assumption.